Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 7;10(12):e0143968.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143968. eCollection 2015.

Stress "Deafness" Reveals Absence of Lexical Marking of Stress or Tone in the Adult Grammar

Affiliations

Stress "Deafness" Reveals Absence of Lexical Marking of Stress or Tone in the Adult Grammar

Hamed Rahmani et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

A Sequence Recall Task with disyllabic stimuli contrasting either for the location of prosodic prominence or for the medial consonant was administered to 150 subjects equally divided over five language groups. Scores showed a significant interaction between type of contrast and language group, such that groups did not differ on their performance on the consonant contrast, while two language groups, Dutch and Japanese, significantly outperformed the three other language groups (French, Indonesian and Persian) on the prosodic contrast. Since only Dutch and Japanese words have unpredictable stress or accent locations, the results are interpreted to mean that stress "deafness" is a property of speakers of languages without lexical stress or tone markings, as opposed to the presence of stress or accent contrasts in phrasal (post-lexical) constructions. Moreover, the degree of transparency between the locations of stress/tone and word boundaries did not appear to affect our results, despite earlier claims that this should have an effect. This finding is of significance for speech processing, language acquisition and phonological theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Mean scores for each language group across the two contrasts.

References

    1. Cutler A. Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge MA: MIT Press; 2012.
    1. Hyman LM. Word-prosodic typology. Phonology. 2006; 23(2): 225–257. 10.1017/S0952675706000893 - DOI
    1. Cutler A. Forbear is a Homophone: Lexical Prosody Does Not Constrain Lexical Access. Lang Speech. 1986; 29(3): 201–220.
    1. Cooper N, Cutler A, Wales R. Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence form native and nonnative listeners. Lang Speech. 2002; 45: 207–228. - PubMed
    1. Friedrich CK, Kotz SA, Friederici AD, Alter K. Pitch modulates lexical identification in spoken word recognition: ERP and behavioral evidence. Cogn Brain Res. 2004; 20: 300–308. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources