Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92570.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092570. eCollection 2014.

Emotional intelligence and mismatching expressive and verbal messages: a contribution to detection of deception

Affiliations

Emotional intelligence and mismatching expressive and verbal messages: a contribution to detection of deception

Jerzy Wojciechowski et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Processing facial emotion, especially mismatches between facial and verbal messages, is believed to be important in the detection of deception. For example, emotional leakage may accompany lying. Individuals with superior emotion perception abilities may then be more adept in detecting deception by identifying mismatch between facial and verbal messages. Two personal factors that may predict such abilities are female gender and high emotional intelligence (EI). However, evidence on the role of gender and EI in detection of deception is mixed. A key issue is that the facial processing skills required to detect deception may not be the same as those required to identify facial emotion. To test this possibility, we developed a novel facial processing task, the FDT (Face Decoding Test) that requires detection of inconsistencies between facial and verbal cues to emotion. We hypothesized that gender and ability EI would be related to performance when cues were inconsistent. We also hypothesized that gender effects would be mediated by EI, because women tend to score as more emotionally intelligent on ability tests. Data were collected from 210 participants. Analyses of the FDT suggested that EI was correlated with superior face decoding in all conditions. We also confirmed the expected gender difference, the superiority of high EI individuals, and the mediation hypothesis. Also, EI was more strongly associated with facial decoding performance in women than in men, implying there may be gender differences in strategies for processing affective cues. It is concluded that integration of emotional and cognitive cues may be a core attribute of EI that contributes to the detection of deception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The structure of the example stimuli (facial expression) presentation in FDT (Face Decoding Test).
Figure 2
Figure 2. The relationship between EI and FDT score as moderated by gender.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relationship between gender and FDT basic emotions with non-congruent sentence as mediated by EI.
The standardized regression coefficient between gender and deception detection controlling for EI is in parentheses. *p<.05, **p<.001.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Relationship between gender and FDT inconsistent emotions subscale score as mediated by EI.
The standardized regression coefficient between gender and deception detection controlling for EI is in parentheses. *p<.05.
Figure 5
Figure 5. The relationship between gender and FDT total score as mediated by EI.
The standardized regression coefficient between gender and deception detection controlling for EI is in parentheses. *p<.05, **p<.001.

References

    1. Saarni C, Lewis M (1993) Deceit and illusions in human affairs. In Lewis M, Saarni C, editors. Lying and deception in everyday life. New York: The Guilford Press. pp. 1–29.
    1. DePaulo BM, Kashy DA, Kirkendol SE, Wyer MM, Epstein JA (1996) Lying in Everyday Life. J Pers Soc Psychol 70: 979–995 10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lewis M (1993) The development of deception. In Lewis M, Saarin C, editors. Lying and deception in everyday life. New York: The Guilford Press. pp. 90–105.
    1. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1971) Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol 17: 124–129 10.1037/h0030377 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Porter S, ten Brinke LM, Baker A, Wallace B (2011) Would I lie to you? “leakage” in deceptive facial expressions relates to psychopathy and emotional intelligence. Pers Individ Dif 51: 133–137 10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.031 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources