Skip to content

[selectors-4] Should we have :open and :closed? #11039

Description

@josepharhar

It was resolved here to have both :open and :closed pseudo-classes: #7319 (comment)

@annevk mentioned here that :closed is redundant with :not(:open): WebKit/standards-positions#413 (comment)

Here is the justification for having both of them: #7319 (comment)

Should we also talk about adding the corresponding :closed pseudo class? That would avoid the problem that :not(:open) can match anything, including things that don't open or close.

The HTML spec has not been merged yet: whatwg/html#10126

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions