Conversation
Benchmark resultsInstruction countsSignificant differencesClick to expand
Other differencesClick to expand
Wall-timeSignificant differencesThere are no significant wall-time differences Other differencesClick to expand
Memory usageKey:
Significant differencesThere are no significant memory usage differences Additional informationCheckout details:
|
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## jbp-quic-generic #3227 +/- ##
====================================================
- Coverage 95.45% 95.45% -0.01%
====================================================
Files 100 100
Lines 23765 23760 -5
Branches 683 683
====================================================
- Hits 22685 22680 -5
Misses 924 924
Partials 156 156 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Have not reviewed in detail, but why would we want this? |
Otherwise |
IIRC |
That is one way. The other way is
This should be at the control of the caller. |
2285d27 to
ebd5d38
Compare
1aa5755 to
e2d44ba
Compare
This is also an associated type of `SideData`. However, this is not used in the `Connection` trait (even though this commit makes that possible!) because ultimately there is no shared public behaviour in these data types.
f4ecb74 to
92a1f79
Compare
This PR moves towards exposing
ClientConnectionDataandServerConnectionDataand unifying accessors for them. As a final step, it exposes them inSplitConnection.