Skip to content

b.p.o emails classified as spam #16

Description

@pitrou

Recently many bpo notification emails started being classified as spam in my inbox. I'm not sure what could be the cause, but it seems like it could be correlated to the recent migration (some SPF setting perhaps?).

Here are the headers of one such email, as received:

Return-Path: [email protected]
Received: from zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net (LHLO
 zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net) (172.20.243.160) by
 zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net with LMTP; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 06:32:31 +0100
 (CET)
Received: from mail-s84.mailgun.info (mx26-g26.priv.proxad.net [172.20.243.96])
	by zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE768230F0
	for <[email protected]>; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 06:32:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-s84.mailgun.info ([184.173.153.212])
	by mx1-g20.free.fr (MXproxy) for [email protected];
	Thu, 27 Dec 2018 06:32:31 +0100 (CET)
X-ProXaD-SC: state=SPAM score=190
X-ProXaD-Cause: (null)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=roundup.psfhosted.org;
 q=dns/txt; s=mx; t=1545888750; h=Date: From: To: Subject:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Reply-To:
 Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender;
 bh=Y5wGYXto0x2bJ06nhNpPJwQkALA8z7SB4wsB8s+PQnE=; b=qfX/03A35J3MRqph6phYN+9di+bhFei/eDzSQ70i/fvUX5eZWimFrLY+/IuAsQSNT0vDbifB
 6JqcPTTirJ9e82WrBKvMi+ziLPI7dNkWs7JxBVBdxu+ncMy87NkjOyG2QQUC78/Y5zkzbk8h
 aUBAAVLYkXnVTBZEEIi5+VcBTOQ=
X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 184.173.153.212
X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MDEyMCIsICJwaXRyb3VAZnJlZS5mciIsICIzM2FmNTYiXQ==
Sender: [email protected]
Received: from bugs.ams1.psf.io (bugs.ams1.psf.io [188.166.48.69])
 by mxa.mailgun.org with ESMTP id 5c2463ed.7fdf7b91dea0-smtp-out-n03;
 Thu, 27 Dec 2018 05:32:29 -0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Reply-To: Python tracker <[email protected]>
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
X-Roundup-issue-status: closed
X-Roundup-issue-type: performance
X-Roundup-issue-keywords: patch
X-Roundup-issue-stage: resolved
X-Roundup-issue-severity: normal
X-Roundup-issue-versions: Python 3.8
X-Roundup-issue-resolution: rejected
X-Roundup-issue-priority: normal
X-Roundup-issue-components: Library (Lib)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [issue35559] Optimize base64.b16decode to use compiled regex
To: [email protected]
From: Karthikeyan Singaravelan <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 05:32:27 +0000
Precedence: bulk
X-Roundup-Name: Python tracker
X-Roundup-Loop: hello
X-Roundup-Version: 1.5.1

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions