Conversation
0387058 to
9d0e48f
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
f631971 to
6f7f39b
Compare
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
9019575 to
2f433b3
Compare
2f433b3 to
daaaf2b
Compare
|
removed the commit changing |
|
Is this good for 0.56-1? :) I say fixing cord highlighting is an important bug fix. I hope this gets considered - ping @millerpuckette |
Sure. If I remember correctly, that's how I first did this on another PR |
|
please do not. right now, the core does not know anything about the "cords to foreground" - it is entirely implemented on the GUI side. i'm really opposed to moving GUI-only stuff over to the core, only to save a bit of implementation for a potential GUI written in another toolkit. in the end this all boils down to: "if you want to write a GUI in GTK/JUCE/FooWdiget, you just have to implement your own TclTk layer for your fancy toolkit". but:
|
|
because @porres is re-iterating this:
i think not.
i totally agree that it is ugly, and annoying. |
this is adding a tcl interpolation function for an attenuated foreground color and reflects the palette in the gui, updated by the
colorsmessage.known issues:
the redundancy of setting the initial color values on the gui side is a bit ugly. it might be an option to send an initial
colorsmessage? but i didn't want to do this here