Conversation
Signed-off-by: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
|
Review requested:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We discussed this in the last Release WG call and there were no objections.
If you're a Intel mac user, you'd need to rely on unofficial binaries
As long as no-one has an expectation that the unofficial-builds project will provide them. But that's not suggested in the change so LGTM!
or greatly extend your machine lifetime by switching to Linux.
Much better idea ;-) Although there's always docker/podman if people really get stuck I guess.
This reverts commit 1d8c022.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #65427 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.11% 90.26% +0.14%
==========================================
Files 752 789 +37
Lines 252321 271428 +19107
Branches 47443 51798 +4355
==========================================
+ Hits 227387 244991 +17604
- Misses 16228 16924 +696
- Partials 8706 9513 +807 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Commit Queue failedThe pull request was removed from the Commit Queue and labeled
commit-queue-failed
Full Commit Queue output |
Following-up from #63931, we've established that Rosetta support (that we use to build universal binaries, i.e. that can be used for both aarch64-darwin and x86_64-darwin) will likely end during Node.js 27 lifetime, so it probably makes sense to stop shipping x86_64-darwin compatible official binaries as of Node.js 27.0.0-alpha.0.0.0.
If you're a Intel mac user, you'd need to rely on unofficial binaries – or greatly extend your machine lifetime by switching to Linux.
/cc @nodejs/build
Refs: nodejs/build#4317