You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
security: highlight phab accounts; recommend phab for nominations
This commit contains two mildly separate concepts.
First, sending out reviews for things like this is a bit of a
complicated endeavor, since the reviewer list is relatively long, and I
generally rely on prior CLs in this area to find an authoritative list.
Life's quite a bit easier if phab usernames are readily available on the
doc. So part 1 is making those available.
Second, it seems to me that, at the moment, Phabricator makes the most
sense for membership changes (incl. security group nominations). My
reasoning for this is detailed in the diff, and to some extent in
comment #1 of this bug
<https://bugs.chromium.org/p/llvm/issues/detail?id=12#c1>. This change
adds prose to recommend the use of Phabricator for nominations as a
result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106917
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: llvm/docs/Security.rst
+21-19Lines changed: 21 additions & 19 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -31,24 +31,24 @@ Group Composition
31
31
Security Group Members
32
32
----------------------
33
33
34
-
The members of the group represent a wide cross-section of the community, and meet the criteria for inclusion below.
35
-
36
-
* Ahmed Bougacha (Apple)
37
-
* Artur Pilipenko (Azul Systems Inc)
38
-
* Dimitry Andric (individual; FreeBSD)
39
-
* Ed Maste (individual; FreeBSD)
40
-
* George Burgess IV (Google)
41
-
* Josh Eads (Sony)
42
-
* Kate McInnes (Apple)
43
-
* Kristof Beyls (ARM)
44
-
* Matthew Riley (Google)
45
-
* Oliver Hunt (Apple)
46
-
* Paul Robinson (Sony)
47
-
* Peter Smith (ARM)
48
-
* Pietro Albini (individual; Rust)
49
-
* Serge Guelton (RedHat)
50
-
* Shayne Hiet-Block (Microsoft)
51
-
* Steve Klabnik (Oxide Computer Company; Rust)
34
+
The members of the group represent a wide cross-section of the community, and meet the criteria for inclusion below. The list is in the format `* ${full_name} (${affiliation}) [${phabricator_username}]`. If a phabricator username for an individual isn't available, the brackets will be empty.
35
+
36
+
* Ahmed Bougacha (Apple) [ab]
37
+
* Artur Pilipenko (Azul Systems Inc) [apilipenko]
38
+
* Dimitry Andric (individual; FreeBSD) [dim]
39
+
* Ed Maste (individual; FreeBSD) [emaste]
40
+
* George Burgess IV (Google) [george.burgess.iv]
41
+
* Josh Eads (Sony) []
42
+
* Kate McInnes (Apple) []
43
+
* Kristof Beyls (ARM) [kristof.beyls]
44
+
* Matthew Riley (Google) [mattdr]
45
+
* Oliver Hunt (Apple) [ojhunt]
46
+
* Paul Robinson (Sony) [probinson]
47
+
* Peter Smith (ARM) [peter.smith]
48
+
* Pietro Albini (individual; Rust) [pietroalbini]
49
+
* Serge Guelton (RedHat) [serge-sans-paille]
50
+
* Shayne Hiet-Block (Microsoft) [Shayne]
51
+
* Steve Klabnik (Oxide Computer Company; Rust) [steveklabnik]
52
52
53
53
Criteria
54
54
--------
@@ -85,8 +85,9 @@ Nomination process
85
85
86
86
Anyone who feels they meet these criteria can nominate themselves, or may be nominated by a third party such as an existing LLVM Security Group member. The nomination should state whether the nominee is nominated as an individual, researcher, or as a vendor contact. It should clearly describe the grounds for nomination.
87
87
88
-
*FUTURE*: where nomination occurs (mailing list, GitHub, etc), can be decided later. See `Discussion Medium`_ below.
88
+
For the moment, nominations are generally proposed, discussed, and voted on using Phabricator. An `example nomination is available here`_. The use of Phabricator helps keep membership discussions open, transparent, and easily accessible to LLVM developers in many ways. If, for any reason, a fully-world-readable nomination seems inappropriate, you may `open a new issue`_, and a discussion can be had about the best way to approach nomination, given the constraints that individuals are under.
89
89
90
+
Our recommended method of nomination may change as our `Discussion Medium`_ story evolves over time.
90
91
91
92
Choosing new members
92
93
--------------------
@@ -226,3 +227,4 @@ The parts of the LLVM Project which are currently treated as non-security sensit
0 commit comments