Skip to content

Should Semantics assume that field values have been coalesced or just unfolded? #116

Description

@royfielding

It is hard to talk about header fields without also noting they might appear across multiple lines via repeated names or obs-fold lines. My goal has been to describe the coalescing of fields in Messaging and only deal with complete values in Semantics. However, I think only obs-fold is specific to HTTP/1.x.

For now, we have the following text (currently in crefs) in the "Field Values" section of Semantics:

This document assumes that any such obs-fold has been replaced with one or more SP octets prior to interpreting the field value, as described in (xref target="line.folding").

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions