This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 2, 2022. It is now read-only.
Add protocol feature RESOURCE_PAYER for the resource payer feature - #10345
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
I think we should call the feature RESOURCE_PAYER instead of TRANSACTION_SPONSORSHIP so it's consistent with the other naming we do in the code. |
ndcgundlach
approved these changes
May 7, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a new protocol feature called RESOURCE_PAYER to be activated to suppor the new feature of "resource payer" which consists of having a 3rd party account to sponsor for the resources consumed on the transaction of another account.
Change Description
Change Type
Select ONE:
Testing Changes
Select ANY that apply:
Consensus Changes
A new protocol feature is introduced.
API Changes
Documentation Additions