Add secure key derivation APIs and restore backward compatibility - #197
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
This PR addresses a security vulnerability in key derivation functions while maintaining full backward compatibility. We introduce new secure APIs and restore the original behavior of existing APIs with deprecation warnings.
Changes
🔄 API Changes
toKeypair,toViemAccount,to_keypair,to_account)toKeypairSecure,toViemAccountSecure,to_keypair_secure,to_account_secure)📦 Version Updates
@phala/[email protected][email protected]🔒 Security Improvements
Backward Compatibility
✅ Fully backward compatible - no breaking changes
✅ Same key generation - deprecated APIs produce identical keys as previous versions
✅ Gradual migration - users can migrate at their own pace
Example Migration
JavaScript
Python